A. Vilnis et al., VACCINE GENOTYPE AND ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION AFFECT PSEUDORABIES FIELD VIRUS LATENCY LOAD AFTER CHALLENGE, Veterinary microbiology, 62(2), 1998, pp. 81-96
The influence of vaccine genotype and route of administration on the e
fficacy of pseudorabies virus (PRV) vaccines against virulent PRV chal
lenge was evaluated in a controlled experiment using five genotypicall
y distinct modified live vaccines (MLVs) for PRV. Several of these MLV
s share deletions in specific genes, however, each has its deletion in
a different locus within that gene. Pigs were vaccinated with each va
ccine, either via the intramuscular or intranasal route, and subsequen
tly challenged with a highly virulent PRV field strain. During a 2-wee
k period following challenge with virulent PRV, each of the vaccine st
rains used in this study was evaluated for its effectiveness in the re
duction of clinical signs, prevention of growth retardation and virule
nt virus shedding. One month after challenge, tissues were collected a
nd analyzed for virulent PRV latency load by a recently developed meth
od for the electrochemiluminescent quantitation of latent herpesvirus
DNA in animal tissues after PCR amplification. It was determined that
all vaccination protocols provided protection against clinical signs r
esulting from field virus challenge and reduced both field virus shedd
ing and latency load after field virus challenge. Our results indicate
d that vaccine efficacy was significantly influenced by the modified l
ive vaccine strain and route of administration. Compared to unvaccinat
ed pigs, vaccination reduced field virus latency load in trigeminal ga
nglia, but significant differences were found between vaccines and rou
tes of administration. We conclude that vaccine genotype plays a role
in the effectiveness of PRV MLVs. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All r
ights reserved.