St. Hammett et al., MOTION BLUR AND MOTION SHARPENING - TEMPORAL SMEAR AND LOCAL CONTRASTNONLINEARITY, Vision research (Oxford), 38(14), 1998, pp. 2099-2108
Blurred images may appear sharper when drifting than when stationary.
But, paradoxically, moving sharp edges may appear more blurred. To res
olve this paradox, the perceived sharpness of drifting, blurred, squar
e wave gratings was compared with that of their static analogues over
a range of speeds, blurs and spatial frequencies. Both motion blur and
motion sharpening occurred, depending upon the physical blur of the p
atterns. For large extents of blur (>10 min are) moving patterns alway
s appeared sharper than their static analogues, but for small blurs (<
10 min are) moving edges appeared more blurred than stationary ones. W
e present a quantitative model for the distortion of waveforms in moti
on based on two factors: (i) visual temporal integration that smears m
oving images, and (ii) a local contrast non-linearity that increasingl
y sharpens the effective profile of edges as speed and contrast increa
se. We suggest that a plausible account of the speed-dependent non-lin
earity is the differential recruitment of M and P cells at different s
peeds. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.