A. Barbaud et al., THE USE OF SKIN TESTING IN THE INVESTIGATION OF CUTANEOUS ADVERSE DRUG-REACTIONS, British journal of dermatology, 139(1), 1998, pp. 49-58
Skin testing with the suspected compound has been reported to be helpf
ul in determining the cause of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs)
, but the value and specificity of these tests need to be determined.
In this study, 72 patients with presumed drug eruptions (27 maculopapu
lar, 18 urticarial, seven erythrodermic, nine eczematous, four photose
nsitivity, three fixed drug eruptions, three with pruritus and one wit
h acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis) were assessed. All had d
rug patch tests; 46 also had prick tests and 30 had intradermal tests
(performed on hospitalized patients using a sterile solution of the su
spected drug, diluted sequentially) with immediate and delayed reading
s. Among these patients, 52 (72%) had a positive skin test reaction, 4
3%, 24% and 67% in patch, prick and intradermal skin tests, respective
ly. The results of skin tests varied with the drug tested and with the
clinical type of cutaneous ADR, as a significantly higher number of p
ositive patch tests was observed in maculopapular rashes than in urtic
arial reactions (P=0.001). This study supports the value of careful se
quential drug skin testing in establishing the cause of cutaneous ADR.
Guidelines are proposed for performing these tests, and these include
the use of appropriate negative control patients to avoid false-posit
ive results.