A. Benigni et al., RENOPROTECTIVE EFFECT OF CONTEMPORARY BLOCKING OF ANGIOTENSIN-II AND ENDOTHELIN-1 IN RATS WITH MEMBRANOUS NEPHROPATHY, Kidney international, 54(2), 1998, pp. 353-359
Background. We previously showed that chronic administration of an ang
iotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor to rats with passive Heyman
n nephritis (PHN), a model of membranous nephropathy with proteinuria
and increased renal synthesis of endothelin-l (ET-1), reduces urinary
proteins and partially limits the exaggerated ET-1 renal synthesis. He
re we compared the effect of an ET, receptor antagonist and an ACE-inh
ibitor given as single therapies with a combination of the two drugs i
n uninephrectomized PHN rats. Methods. PHN was induced with a single i
.v. injection of rabbit anti-Fx1A antibody in 40 male Sprague Dawley r
ats. To accelerate the onset of renal damage rats underwent uninephrec
tomy seven days later and were subsequently treated until eight months
with the ET, receptor antagonist LU-135252 (50 mg/kg b.i.d. p.o.) or
the ACE-inhibitor trandolapril (1 mg/kg in the drinking water) or the
combination of the two drugs. Results. Either LU-135252 or trandolapri
l given alone prevented the increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP).
Combined therapy was even more effective than single drugs. While LU1
35252 and trandolapril reduced proteinuria by 23 to 25%, the drug comb
ination resulted in 45% lowering of urinary proteins. Serum creatinine
was significantly decreased by the combination, but not by the single
drugs. Glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial damage were more red
uced by combined therapy than by LU-135252 or trandolapril alone. Conc
lusions. These data suggest that contemporary blocking angiotensin II
(Ang II) and ET-1 in an accelerated model of PHN had an additive renop
rotective effect than single blocking Ang II or ET-1 and would represe
nt a therapeutic advantage for renal disease patients who do not compl
etely respond to ACE inhibitors.