Sh. Yang et al., NEURAL-NETWORK COMPUTER-PROGRAM TO DETERMINE PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY NOMOGRAMS, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 24(7), 1998, pp. 917-924
Purpose: To evaluate a commercially available neural network program f
or calculation of photorefractive keratectomy treatment nomograms. Set
ting: University referral refractive surgery clinic. Methods: PRK/LASI
K Brain(TM), a commercial neural network computer program, was trained
using the demographics, preoperalive clinical data, surgical paramete
rs, and 1 year postoperative clinical data of 44 patients treated with
a Summit Technology excimer laser using a 5.0 mm optical zone. The ne
ural-network-derived nomogram was compared with the standard treatment
nomogram for each patient The relative contribution of age, sex, kera
tometry, and intraocular pressure. (IOP) to the predicted nomograms wa
s also assessed. Results: Nomograms produced by the neural network wer
e qualitatively similar to the standard nomogram.The sequence of data
entry during training affected the network's predictions. Entry ordere
d by Outcome (as opposed to entry by chronological order) yielded a no
mogram that was more consistent with the 1 standard nomogram. However,
both outcome- and chronologically ordered network-derived nomograms d
iverged from the standard nomogram in individual Ir patients, includin
g a subset for whom use of the standard nomogram yielded desired refra
ctive results (within 0.25 diopter of emmetropia). Further analysis of
the neural-network-derived nomograms revealed marked sensitivity to s
ex, age, keratometry readings, and IOP. Conclusions: Neural networks o
ffer a potential means of individualizing treatment nomograms to accou
nt for patient demographics, preoperative examination, surgeon style,
and equipment bias. However, a data set of 44 patients was not surgeon
style, and equipment bias. However, a data set of 44 patients was not
sufficient to train the PRK/IASIK Brain network to accurately predict
treatment parameters in individual cases in the training set. A large
r training set or a different learning algorithm may be required to im
prove the neural network's performance.