S. Omeara et al., SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTIONS USED IN THE MANAGEMENT OF OBESITY, Journal of human nutrition and dietetics, 11(3), 1998, pp. 203-206
This paper briefly describes the principles of undertaking a systemati
c review of the effectiveness of obesity management interventions. Obj
ective: To assess the effectiveness of interventions used in the preve
ntion and treatment of obesity and the maintenance of weight loss. Bac
kground: Obesity represents a serious public health problem due to the
associated risks of disease and mortality. Prevalence of the conditio
n is increasing and the relevant Health of the Nation target is unlike
ly to be met. Methods and search strategy: A qualitative systematic re
view of the research literature, using electronic databases and contac
t with experts. Inclusion criteria: Randomized controlled trials evalu
ating the effectiveness of interventions used in managing obesity in w
hich participants were observed for a minimum of 1 year. For studies o
f prevention, non-randomized controlled trials with a concurrent contr
ol group were also eligible. Results: Ninety-nine studies were include
d, most of which had been performed in North America. The methodologic
al quality of many of the studies was poor. Family therapy and communi
ty education programmes were shown to be effective in preventing obesi
ty in children and adults, respectively. Programmes based on the reduc
tion of sedentary behaviour were effective in the treatment of obese c
hildren. For the treatment of obese adults, behavioural, diet, exercis
e and drug therapies can be effective when used in combination. Surger
y is effective in morbidly obese patients. Weight regain is common fol
lowing many types of weight loss interventions, and maintenance progra
mmes based on continued contact may be useful. Conclusions: This revie
w has identified some potentially effective interventions for the mana
gement of obesity. However, results should be interpreted with caution
due to problems with the methodological quality of primary studies.