Spontaneous separation of enantiomers in two- and three-dimensional cr
ystals is driven by the same thermodynamic and kinetic factors. Howeve
r, amphiphilic crystalline monolayers at an interface cannot possess a
center of inversion, the most common symmetry element in bulk crystal
s. This fact should, in principle, lead to better chances for spontane
ous separation in the Langmuir or Langmuir-Blodgett monomolecular film
s. On the other hand, the monolayers of most amphiphiles studied to da
te incorporate long aliphatic chains that have an intrinsic tendency t
o pack in a herringbone motif requiring glide plane symmetry, thus cre
ating a bias towards racemate formation. Moreover, 2-D crystals suppos
edly have a much higher degree of molecular and therefore enantiomeric
disorder compared to bulk crystals. All these factors necessitate a c
areful choice of molecules to guarantee enantiomeric separation in two
dimensions. Unambiguous detection of spontaneous resolution in 2-D ap
pears to require atomic resolution of molecular packing arrangement, w
hich can in principle be obtained by grazing incidence X-ray diffracti
on or atomic force microscopy, whereas in bulk solids spontaneous reso
lution can be easily detected by various macroscopic methods. This sho
rt review provides analogies between spontaneous separation in 3-D and
recent examples in 2-D, showing that spontaneous separation generally
depends upon subtle differences in molecular structure. (C) 1998 Wile
y-Liss, Inc.