Thrombolytic therapy has contributed to the decline in hospital mortal
ity following myocardial infarction. Measurement of mortality rates is
appealing, due to the ease of documentation. The GUSTO study, which c
ompared alteplase and streptokinase regimens, demonstrated that higher
patency rates result in lower 30-day mortality. Saruplase is more eff
icacious than streptokinase at restoring coronary artery patency. Pate
ncy at 60 min after starting saruplase was 71.8% and after streptokina
se 48.0%, in the PRIMI study. Therefore, the COMPASS study was perform
ed to compare the 30-day mortality rates of saruplase and streptokinas
e, and 3089 patients were entered into the study in 104 centres. The m
ortality rates at 30 days were 5.7% for saruplase and 6.7% for strepto
kinase, a 15% relative reduction. The odds ratio was 0.84 (p<0.01 for
equivalence). Therefore, saruplase can be considered to be at least cl
inically equivalent to streptokinase in terms of mortality. Stroke rat
es were 1.4% in both groups, and there was no difference in the rate o
f bleeding events. Reinfarction occurred in 5.4% of the saruplase-trea
ted patients and in 4.5% of the streptokinase-treated patients. Hypote
nsion and cardiogenic shock were reported more often following treatme
nt with streptokinase than following treatment with saruplase.