Tw. Troyer et al., CONTRAST-INVARIANT ORIENTATION TUNING IN CAT VISUAL-CORTEX - THALAMOCORTICAL INPUT TUNING AND CORRELATION-BASED INTRACORTICAL CONNECTIVITY, The Journal of neuroscience, 18(15), 1998, pp. 5908-5927
The origin of orientation selectivity in visual cortical responses is
a central problem for understanding cerebral cortical circuitry. In ca
ts, many experiments suggest that orientation selectivity arises from
the arrangement of lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) afferents to layer
4 simple cells. However, this explanation is not sufficient to accoun
t for the contrast invariance of orientation tuning. To understand con
trast invariance, we first characterize the input to cat simple cells
generated by the oriented arrangement of LGN afferents. We demonstrate
that it has two components: a spatial-phase-specific component (i.e.,
one that depends on receptive field spatial phase), which is tuned fo
r orientation, and a phase-nonspecific component, which is untuned. Bo
th components grow with contrast. Second, we show that a correlation-b
ased intracortical circuit, in which connectivity between cell pairs i
s determined by the correlation of their LGN inputs, is sufficient to
achieve well tuned, contrast-invariant orientation tuning. This circui
t generates both spatially opponent, ''antiphase'' inhibition (''push-
pull''), and spatially matched, ''same-phase'' excitation. The inhibit
ion, if sufficiently strong, suppresses the untuned input component an
d sharpens responses to the tuned component at all contrasts. The exci
tation amplifies tuned responses. This circuit agrees with experimenta
l evidence showing spatial opponency between, and similar orientation
tuning of, the excitatory and inhibitory inputs received by a simple c
ell. Orientation tuning is primarily input driven, accounting for the
observed invariance of tuning width after removal of intracortical syn
aptic input, as well as for the dependence of orientation tuning on st
imulus spatial frequency. The model differs from previous push-pull mo
dels in requiring dominant rather than balanced inhibition and in pred
icting that a population of layer 4 inhibitory neurons should respond
in a contrast-dependent manner to stimuli of all orientations, althoug
h their tuning width may be similar to that of excitatory neurons. The
model demonstrates that fundamental response properties of cortical l
ayer 4 can be explained by circuitry expected to develop under correla
tion-based rules of synaptic plasticity, and shows how such circuitry
allows the cortex to distinguish stimulus intensity from stimulus form
.