L. Sasvari et Z. Hegyi, HOW MIXED-SPECIES FORAGING FLOCKS DEVELOP IN RESPONSE TO BENEFITS FROM OBSERVATIONAL-LEARNING, Animal behaviour, 55, 1998, pp. 1461-1469
We created experimental situations where observers (great tit, Parus m
ajor and marsh tit, P, palustris) acquired one of five types of experi
ence near conspecific and non-conspecific demonstrators: (1) neither d
emonstrator was feeding; (2) only the conspecific was feeding; (3) onl
y the non-conspecific was feeding; (4) both were feeding and the obser
ver received a reinforcement (food) near the conspecific; and (5) as (
4), but the reinforcement was given near the non-conspecific. After ea
ch treatment, we recorded whether the observer approached a caged cons
pecific or a caged non-conspecific. There was a baseline preference fo
r approaching conspecifics but this could be overcome by learnt associ
ations so that the birds would then approach non-conspecifics. When th
ere was an opportunity to distinguish between successful and unsuccess
ful foragers (demonstrators), and the successful forager was not consp
ecific, observers of the dominant species approached the successful su
bordinate non-conspecifics, Observers of the subordinate species appro
ached the dominant species only if they had received a food reinforcem
ent near them. Observers followed non-conspecific individuals more oft
en at temperatures below than above 0 degrees C and chose a conspecifi
c individual more often above than below 0 degrees C. (C) 1998 The Ass
ociation for the Study of Animal Behaviour.