The authors investigate MacCormick and Weinberger's claim that the Ins
titutional Theory of Law provides a conceptual framework for the study
of legal phenomena from a socio-legal point of view. They evaluate th
is claim by confronting both the Institutional Theory of Law and Weinb
erger's theory of action with two approaches in socio-legal theory, i.
e. the instrumentalist and the constitutive approach. The conclusion i
s that the Institutional Theory of Law lends itself to empirical resea
rch from an instrumentalist perspective, for both place the concept 'i
nstitution' in the context of law. Weinberger's theory of action may p
rovide a basis for empirical research from a constitutive perspective.
The authors make some suggestions for refinement of Weinberger's theo
ry of action in order that the relation between institutions and actio
n can be labeled dynamic.