Cr. Anderson et al., DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF SIGHTABILITY MODELS FOR SUMMER ELK SURVEYS, The Journal of wildlife management, 62(3), 1998, pp. 1055-1066
We developed 2 sightability models from summer helicopter surveys of r
adiocollared elk (Cervus elaphus) in Grand Teton National Park, Wyomin
g. Significant variables (P < 0.05) included elk group size, activity,
and percent vegetation cover for Model A, and elk group size and perc
ent vegetation cover for Model B. We compared these 2 summer models an
d a winter elk sightability model developed in Idaho that incorporates
group size, percent vegetation cover, and percent snow cover. We base
d model comparisons on predicted detection rates and model performance
when applied to well-documented elk populations at Starkey Experiment
al Forest and Range, Oregon (SEF), and Wind Cave National Park, South
Dakota (WCNP). Pre dieted sightability was similar from summer Models
A and B for active elk in <60% vegetation cover, but was lower from Mo
del A for bedded elk. Model estimates of elk abundance (WCNP, SEF) and
composition (SEF) usually were more accurate and consistently more pr
ecise from Model B, suggesting elk activity had little influence on es
timates of sum.mer elk population characteristics. Comparisons between
Model B and the Idaho model indicated predicted sightability of small
groups (less than or equal to 10 elk) was similar; the Idaho model pr
ovided better accuracy and precision for validation tests of populatio
ns consisting of predominantly small elk groups (WCNP: = 4.7 elk/group
; SEF: = 6.3 elk/group). The Idaho model, however, overestimated detec
tion of large elk groups (30-45 elk/group) in moderate-dense vegetatio
n (>30% vegetation cover), but this overestimation was accounted for b
y Model B. Thus, we recommend application of the Idaho model during su
mmer surveys where elk are less gregarious (<20 elk) and recommend app
lication of summer Model B to high-density elk populations where elk o
ccur in larger groups.