Jc. Turp et al., TREATMENT-SEEKING PATTERNS OF FACIAL-PAIN PATIENTS - MANY POSSIBILITIES, LIMITED SATISFACTION, Journal of orofacial pain, 12(1), 1998, pp. 61-66
Knowledge about the different kinds of treatment provided to patients
with nonmalignant musculoskeletal facial pain is limited. The present
study was based on 206 consecutive patients who were referred to a uni
versity-based tertiary care clinic for the diagnosis and management of
persistent facial pain. Its purpose was to get information about the
number and specialty of providers consulted by patients prior to their
referral, and to follow the underlying treatment-seeking patterns. Th
e results showed that on average 4.88 providers from 44 different cate
gories were consulted. A general dentist or a dental specialist was se
en by about 70% of patients. For patients whose first provider was a d
entist, the most likely subsequent provider was another dentist. Conve
rsely, if the first provider was a physician, chances were greater tha
t the subsequent provider tt,as a physician rather than a dentist. Amo
ng the nondental therapies patients received physical therapy was chos
en most frequently (42.2%). More than 60% of patients had at least one
nondental treatment; however, the majority of these patients experien
ced two or move different types of such therapy (eg, chiropractic, ost
eopathic, relaxation training). Patients' satisfaction with cave and t
reatment was moderate, since only 18.5% of the patients were very sati
sfied, while 27.7% were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. The present
findings, which corroborate a recent study from the Kansas City, Miss
ouri, region, indicate that patients with persistent facial pain see a
large number of different providers, and that nonmedical/nondental tr
eatment approaches are common. The moderate satisfaction experienced w
ith any of the therapies points out that much needs to be done before
this patient population is served satisfactorily.