THE EFFECT OF CERVICAL TRACTION COMBINED WITH ROTATORY MANIPULATION ON CERVICAL NUCLEUS PULPOSUS PRESSURES

Citation
Yk. Li et al., THE EFFECT OF CERVICAL TRACTION COMBINED WITH ROTATORY MANIPULATION ON CERVICAL NUCLEUS PULPOSUS PRESSURES, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 21(2), 1998, pp. 97-100
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation
ISSN journal
01614754
Volume
21
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
97 - 100
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-4754(1998)21:2<97:TEOCTC>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Objective: To study experimentally the effect of cervical traction com bined with rotatory manipulation on the pressure of the cervical nucle us pulposus. Design: Randomized experimental study. Setting: Institute of Clinical Anatomy and Biomechanics, the First Military Medical Univ ersity, GuangZhou, China. Subjects: Twelve fresh cervical spines, from C7 to occipital bone, were obtained from cadavers of patients who had died from acute brain death. Interventions: State A: under different traction forces, the cervical spine was rotated. State B: the cervical spine was rotated first and then tractioned. State C: the cervical sp ine was tractioned and rotated simultaneously. Main Outcome Measures: The cervical spine was tractioned and rotated by the Material Test Sys tem (MTS), and pressures of the cervical nucleus pulposus of C3-4, C4- 5 and C5-6 were measured using pressure sensors. Results: (a) When the traction force increased, the pressure fell continuously in the 200-N tractioned spines; the pressure increased slightly when the sample wa s rotated. (b) The pressure fell to a certain extent when the state of cervical spine was restored. (c) In state A, the pressure fell obviou sly and increased slightly under a 200-N traction force and then the s ample was rotated; in state B, the pressure first increased to a certa in extent and then fell slightly and in state C, the pressure underwen t no change in the main. Conclusions: The results of this research sug gest that rotatory manipulation of cervical spine under traction was t he safest of the three procedures and the traction force used in clini cal treatment may be a little smaller.