P. Ngan et al., CEPHALOMETRIC AND OCCLUSAL CHANGES FOLLOWING MAXILLARY EXPANSION AND PROTRACTION, European journal of orthodontics (Print), 20(3), 1998, pp. 237-254
A prospective clinical trial was conducted to determine the cephalomet
ric and occlusal changes following maxillary expansion and protraction
. Twenty Southern Chinese patients (eight males and 12 females with a
mean age of 8.4 +/- 1.8 years) with skeletal Class III malocclusions w
ere treated consecutively with maxillary expansion and a protraction f
acemask. Growth adaptation of these patients was followed for 2 years
after removal of the appliances and compared with a control group of s
ubjects with no treatment. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were used
to quantify the skeletal and dental changes before treatment (T-1), i
mmediately after treatment (T-2) and 2 years after removal of applianc
es (T-3). With 8 months of treatment (T-2 - T-1), overjet was.overcorr
ected from a -2.0 to 3.5 mm. The maxilla moved forwards by an average
of 2.1 mm and the molar relationship was improved to, a:Class I dental
arch relationship. The palatal and occlusal planes were tilted upward
1.0 and 2.0 degrees, respectively. Two years following removal of the
appliances (T-3 - T-2), a positive overjet was maintained in 18 out o
f 20 patients. The maxilla continued to move forwards in the treated s
ubjects similar to the controls. The mandible outgrew the maxilla. In
most instances, dental compensation with proclination of the maxillary
incisors was observed. The palatal plane returned to pre-treatment va
lue. The occlusal plane continued to tilt upward due to eruption of th
e molars and proclination of the incisors. Analysis of dental casts sh
owed a significant increase in maxillary intercanine (2.2 mm) and inte
rmolar widths (2.3 mm) with 7 days of rapid palatal expansion followed
by maxillary protraction. The percentage relapse in maxillary intermo
lar widths was 30-45 per cent after 1 year, in most cases with minimal
retention. In the mandibular arch, the concurrent increase in intermo
lar width (2.3 mm) was primarily due to buccal uprighting of the poste
rior molars when the maxilla was protracted into a Class I skeletal re
lationship and was stable after 1 year. The results of this study indi
cate stability of orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusions dir
ected at the maxilla. Despite some relapse, a net improvement in maxil
lomandibular relationship and a positive overjet was maintained in 18
out of 20 patients at the end of the follow-up period.