B. Brembillaperrot et al., RESULTS OF ROUTINE PROGRAMMED VENTRICULAR STIMULATION AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - WHICH PROTOCOL SHOULD BE USED, Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux, 86(10), 1993, pp. 1453-1457
The authors report the prognostic value of ventricular arrhythmias ind
uced by routine programmed ventricular stimulation after the acute pha
se of myocardial infarction. The protocol consisted of two extrastimul
i in the first 185 patients and 3 extrastimuli in 308 patients. The us
e of 3 extrastimuli increased the incidence of inducible sustained mon
omorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) < 270/mn, from 17 to 22 % and, m
ore importantly, that of ventricular fibrillation from 4 to 17 %. Indu
ction of ventricular flutter (monomorphic VT > 270/mn) was not increas
ed. A long follow-up period (average 4 +/- 2 years) showed that the ri
sk of VT was increased during the first months after infarction (n = 1
4), and that, 4 years later, other patients develop VT (n = 6). The ri
sk of serious arrhythmias (VT and sudden death) was significantly high
er in patients with inducible VT < 270/mn (20 %) than in patients with
out inducible VT, but it was also higher in patients with inducible ve
ntricular flutter (12,5 %). The use of a third extrastimulus has a low
positive predictive value for arrhythmic events (10 %). This study co
nfirms that the induction of sustained monomorphic VT after myocardial
infarction is associated with an increased risk of arrhythmic events
but the positive predictive value is relatively low (17 %). In view of
the risk of inducing non-specific ventricular fibrillation, the autho
rs recommended using a stimulation protocol with only 2 ventricular ex
trastimuli.