Objective: The purpose of this multicenter, add-on, double-blind, rand
omized, active-control study was to compare the efficacy and safety of
presumably therapeutic (high) vagus nerve stimulation with less (low)
stimulation. Background: Chronic intermittent left vagus nerve stimul
ation has been shown in animal models and in preliminary clinical tria
ls to suppress the occurrence of seizures, Methods: Patients had at le
ast six partial-onset seizures over 30 days involving complex partial
or secondarily generalized seizures. Concurrent antiepileptic drugs we
re unaltered. After a 3-month baseline, patients were surgically impla
nted with stimulating leads coiled around the left vagus nerve and con
nected to an infraclavicular subcutaneous programmable pacemaker-like
generator. After randomization, device initiation, and a 2-week ramp-u
p period, patients were assessed for seizure counts and safety over 3
months. The primary efficacy variable was the percentage change in tot
al seizure frequency compared with baseline. Results: Patients receivi
ng high stimulation (94 patients, ages 13 to 54 years) had an average
28% reduction in total seizure frequency compared with a 15% reduction
in the low stimulation group (102 patients, ages 15 to 60 year; p = 0
.04). The high-stimulation group also had greater improvements on glob
al evaluation scores, as rated by a blinded interviewer and the patien
t. High stimulation was associated with more voice alteration and dysp
nea. No changes in physiologic indicators of gastric, cardiac, or pulm
onary functions occurred. Conclusions: Vagus nerve stimulation is an e
ffective and safe adjunctive treatment for patients with refractory pa
rtial-onset seizures. It represents the advent of a new, nonpharmacolo
gic treatment for epilepsy.