Wu. Reimold et al., THE 1992 DRILL CORE FROM THE KALKKOP IMPACT CRATER, EASTERN-CAPE PROVINCE, SOUTH-AFRICA - STRATIGRAPHY, PETROGRAPHY, GEOCHEMISTRY AND AGE, Journal of African earth sciences, and the Middle East, 26(4), 1998, pp. 573-592
New drill core data are provided which support earlier interpretations
that the Kalkkop structure, a 600-630 m wide, near-circular feature s
outh-southwest of Graaff-Reinet in the Eastern Cape Province of South
Africa, is a meteorite impact crater. Shock metamorphosed clasts in su
evitic crater fill and Re-Os isotope data of this breccia indicate the
presence of a minor (0.05%) meteoritic component in the suevite. The
new data come from a 1992 borehole, which transected the complete crat
er fill and extended from about 160 to 380 m depth into the sedimentar
y basement belonging to the Koonap Formation of the Beaufort Group (Ka
roo Supergroup). Dyke breccias were found in the otherwise coherent Be
aufort Group sediments forming the floor to the Kalkkop Crater. Mostly
narrow zones of different breccia types, including injections of lith
ic impact breccia, a possible pseudotachylite veinlet and cataclasite
occur predominantly in an approximately 65 m wide zone below the crate
r floor, with a few other cataclasite occurrences found lower down in
the basement. Stratigraphical crater constraints provide information f
or the depth-diameter scaling and breccia volumes associated with such
small, bowl-shaped impact craters formed in sedimentary targets. U-Th
series dating of limestone samples from near the top and the bottom o
f the crater sediment fill constrains the age of the Kalkkop impact ev
ent to about 250 +/- 50 ka, similar to the age of the Pretoria Saltpan
impact crater, also located in South Africa. The variety of different
breccia types (polymict and monomict impact breccias; local formation
s of pseudotachylitic and cataclastic breccias) observed in the crater
fill of the Kalkkop Crater indicates the need to carefully distinguis
h different breccia types in order to assess the respective importance
of each formation. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Limited.