Bl. Gros et al., ANISOTROPIES IN VISUAL-MOTION PERCEPTION - A FRESH LOOK, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science,and vision., 15(8), 1998, pp. 2003-2011
We measured motion-detection and motion-discrimination performance for
different directions of motion, using stochastic motion sequences. Ra
ndom-dot cinematograms containing 200 dots in a circular aperture were
used as stimuli in a two-interval forced-choice procedure. In the mot
ion-detection experiment, observers judged which of two intervals cont
ained weak coherent motion, the other interval containing random motio
n only. In the direction-discrimination experiment, observers viewed a
standard direction of motion followed by comparison motion in a sligh
tly different direction. Observers indicated whether the comparison wa
s clockwise or counterclockwise, relative to the standard. Twelve dire
ctions of motion were tested in the detection task and five standard d
irections (three cardinal directions and two oblique directions) in th
e discrimination task. Detection thresholds were invariant with direct
ion of motion, but direction-discrimination thresholds were significan
tly higher for motion in oblique directions, even at low-coherence lev
els. Results from control conditions ruled out monitor artifacts and i
ndicate that the oblique effect is relative to retinal coordinates. Th
ese results have broad implications for computational and physiologica
l models of motion perception. (C) 1998 Optical Society of America.