SIMULTANEOUS DISCRIMINATION OF VELOCITY AND CONTRAST OF DRIFTING GRATINGS

Citation
R. Muller et Mw. Greenlee, SIMULTANEOUS DISCRIMINATION OF VELOCITY AND CONTRAST OF DRIFTING GRATINGS, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science,and vision., 15(8), 1998, pp. 2023-2035
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Optics
ISSN journal
10847529
Volume
15
Issue
8
Year of publication
1998
Pages
2023 - 2035
Database
ISI
SICI code
1084-7529(1998)15:8<2023:SDOVAC>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Discrimination thresholds for velocity and contrast were measured as a function of (1) the stimulus duration, (2) the reference contrast of the stimuli, (3) the stimulus velocity, and (4) whether the observer k new on which dimension, velocity or contrast, the gratings would diffe r. Two vertically oriented grating patches were presented centered 2 d eg left and right of the fixation point. The stimuli drifted under a s tationary envelope to the right at a speed of either 1.25 deg/s (Exper iment 1) or 5 deg/s (Experiment 2). The reference contrast was varied over five interleaved staircases from 0.02 to 0.32 in equal logarithmi c steps. The results of two different tasks were compared. In the sing le-judgment task, the subject knew along which dimension the stimuli w ould change and was asked to judge which stimulus had the higher value along that dimension. In the dual-judgment task, the stimuli could di ffer in either velocity or contrast but not both. In this task the sub ject first indicated which dimension differed and second which stimulu s had the higher value along that dimension. The dual-/single-judgment threshold ratios remained constant over a wide range of stimulus cond itions. The mean value of these ratios, however, significantly exceeds that expected by the vector model presented by Greenlee and Thomas [J . Opt. Sec. Am. A 10, 395 (1993)]. A modification of the model, which assumes that velocity and contrast are not independently coded, appear s to be sufficient to account for the observed differences. The result s are in line with the known dependency of perceived speed on stimulus contrast. (C) 1998 Optical Society of America.