Me. Ramsay et al., SALIVARY DIAGNOSIS OF RUBELLA - A STUDY OF NOTIFIED CASES IN THE UNITED-KINGDOM, 1991-4, Epidemiology and infection, 120(3), 1998, pp. 315-319
Rubella infections, notified by general practitioners on the basis of
a clinical diagnosis, were investigated by testing blood and saliva sa
mples for specific IgM. Overall 52 (29 %) of 178 cases with appropriat
ely timed blood specimens were confirmed as recent rubella by IgM sero
logy. Only 2 (3 %) of 74 cases in children under 5 years were confirme
d compared to 50 (48 %) of 104 cases in older children and adults. The
confirmation rate was lower (6 %) in those with documented vaccinatio
n history than in those without (42%). The specificity of saliva rubel
la IgM testing compared to testing corresponding blood samples was 99
%. The overall sensitivity of saliva rubella IgM testing was 81 %. Thi
s rose to 90% if results from inappropriately timed specimens and spec
imens taking more than 1 week to reach the laboratory were excluded. A
corresponding saliva rubella IgG test was 98 % sensitive and 100% spe
cific. Of 126 rubella IgM negative cases, 25 (20 %) were positive for
parvovirus B19 IgM. This study confirmed that rubella surveillance bas
ed on clinical reports is not specific. It also demonstrated that sali
va samples, if taken 7-42 days after onset of illness and transported
rapidly to the laboratory, are a feasible alternative to blood samples
for rubella surveillance.