Objectives: To quantify the risk of skin reactions to antibacterial dr
ugs under everyday circumstances in a large population with automated
data from general practitioners (GP). Design: A retrospective cohort s
tudy in a dynamic population. Setting: Data came from the Integrated P
rimary Care Information (IPCI) database. The IPCI database consists of
all data on consultations, moroidity, and prescriptions and other int
erventions, as registered by the GP in a source population of approxim
ately 150,000 persons. Methods: The study period started on April 1, 1
994, and ended on September 30, 1995. Pill patients who were treated w
ith an antibacterial drug were enrolled on the first day of starting t
reatment until the end elf the study period or until the occurrence of
one or more of the following diagnoses within the risk period: allerg
ic reaction, rash, erythema, pruritus and urticaria, or a notification
of a skin reaction in the free text. Subsequently, patient profiles w
ere assessed by two authors who were blinded to exposure. The risk per
iod was defined as the legend duration of the antibacterial drug plus
14 days to control for carry-over of drug effects and delay in patient
presentation. Age, gender, and comedication were examined as potentia
l confounders. Results: In the study period 13,679 patients received 1
9,961 prescriptions of an antibacterial drug. It concerned 5330 men (3
9.0%) and 8349 (61.0%) women with a mean age of 41 and 42 years, respe
ctively. One hundred thirty-five patients developed a skin reaction in
the risk period. Rash, pruritus, urticaria, and miscellaneous skin re
actions were encountered in 76 (56.3%), 18 (13.3%), 19 (14.1%), and 22
(16.3%) patients, respectively. The three most frequently reported ca
uses of skin reactions were combinations of trimethoprim with sulfonam
ides (2.1% of users; incidence density [ID]: 2.1/1000 exposed days), f
luoroquinolones (1.6% of users; TD: 1.5/1000 person days), and penicil
lins (1.1% of users; ID: 1.3/1000 person days). Compared to tetracycli
nes, the broad-spectrum penicillins showed an incidence density ratio
(IDR) of 3.7, the combination of amoxicillin with clavulanic acid of 3
.3, the fluoroquinolones of 2.8, and the combination of trimethoprim w
ith sulphonamides of 4.4. The presence of infectious mononucleosis inc
reased the risk of rash in amoxicillin users with a factor of 58. Conc
lusions: We found that the frequency of skin reactions to antibacteria
l drugs in general practice is around 1% and highest for the combinati
on of trimethoprim with sulphonamides, penicillins, and fluoroquinolon
es. The outpatient incidence for skin reactions is probably lower than
the incidence in hospitalized patients. Although this may be partly e
xplained by negative misclassification, it is also likely that the act
ual incidence is lower as some hospitalized patient groups may be more
prone to develop a skin reaction. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.