Is. Gill et al., NEEDLESCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY - THE INITIAL SERIES - COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY, Urology, 52(2), 1998, pp. 180-186
Objectives. To report the initial series of needlescopic transperitone
al adrenalectomy and to compare the results with a contemporary series
of conventional transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy performed
at the same institution.Methods. Fifteen patients underwent needlescop
ic adrenalectomy over a 4-month period. Outcome data were retrospectiv
ely compared with 21 conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomies perform
ed over the preceding 12-month period at the same institution. The nee
dlescopic technique included three subcostal ports (two, 2 mm; one, 5
mm) and one umbilical port for ultimate specimen extraction (10/12 mm)
. The laparoscopic technique included four subcostal ports (all 10/12
mm). Endoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy was completed by the sta
ndard technique in both groups. Results. Baseline demographics were co
mparable between the needlescopic (n = 15) and laparoscopic (n = 21) g
roups. The needlescopic group had a shorter surgical time (169 versus
220 minutes, P = 0.05), less blood loss (61 versus 183 mL, P = 0.002),
and shorter hospital stay (1.1 versus 2.7 days, P < 0.001). Convalesc
ence averaged 2.1 weeks in the needlescopic group and 3.1 weeks in the
laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). No significant complications occurred
in either group. One patient in the needlescopic group was converted
to conventional laparoscopy because of marked obesity; hospital stay i
n this patient was 2 days.Conclusions. Reported herein is the initial
series of needlescopic adrenalectomy. Compared with conventional lapar
oscopy, needlescopic adrenalectomy results in an overnight hospital st
ay, rapid recovery, and excellent cosmesis. However, prior experience
with conventional laparoscopy is essential before embarking on needles
copic surgery. UROLOGY 52: 180-186, 1998. (C) 1998, Elsevier Science I
nc. All rights reserved.