Objectives. Biofeedback therapy has been recognized as a treatment opt
ion for children with classic dysfunctional voiding (DV) where there i
s inadequate pelvic floor relaxation during voiding. However, there ar
e few articles that discuss methodology and limited sites where it is
available. In the hope of making biofeedback a more practical and acce
ssible option, we report our indications, easy to duplicate methodolog
y, and results. Methods. Twenty-one consecutive children diagnosed wit
h DV refractory to standard therapy were enrolled in our biofeedback p
rogram. Therapy consisted of extensive age-appropriate explanations of
DV and demonstrations of normal and abnormal voiding patterns. Cyclic
uroflow studies with pelvic floor electromyography are performed, whi
ch the child monitors on analog chart and audio recorders. The child r
eturns weekly until consistent relaxation of the pelvic floor during v
oiding is demonstrated, Timing between sessions is then increased to m
onitor progress and retention of concepts previously taught. Results.
An excellent clinical response was one in which there was consistent r
elaxation of the pelvic floor throughout voiding, normal flow pattern,
and no residual urine volume (urodynamic response), coupled with prof
ound resolution of voiding symptoms. Seventeen of 21 (81%) had an exce
llent response, 3 (14%) had a fair response, and 1 (5%) was too incons
istent to rate. The average number of sessions to achieve a consistent
urodynamic response was 3.7 (range 2 to 14) and full clinical respons
e somewhat longer. Average follow-up since beginning therapy has been
34 months (range 14 to 51). Conclusions. Biofeedback therapy is an eff
ective method for treating DV with poor pelvic floor relaxation. Altho
ugh initially labor intensive, it yields sustained positive results in
most patients in a short time. UROLOGY 52: 312-315, 1998. (C) 1998, E
lsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.