D. Meh et M. Denislic, SUBCLINICAL NEUROPATHY IN TYPE-I DIABETIC CHILDREN, ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 109(3), 1998, pp. 274-280
Objectives: Small and large, somatic and autonomic nerve fibre functio
ns were neurophysiologically evaluated in 33 asymptomatic neurological
ly free type 1 diabetic children and 69 age-matched healthy controls.
Methods: The evaluation of large and small somatic nerve fibre functio
n was performed by conventional nerve conduction studies, thermal spec
ific and thermal pain sensitivity tests, as well as autonomic nerve fi
bre functions by sympathetic skin response and R-R interval variation
assessment. Results: A significant difference was established between
the healthy and the diabetic group. Neurophysiologically determined su
bclinical neuropathy was found in 87% of type 1 diabetic children. The
majority of abnormal recordings were found on the lower limbs. The dy
sfunction of the somatic motor large nerve fibre type in the lower lim
bs was altered in 57% of patients, somatic sensory large in 39%, somat
ic sensory small in 45%, and sympathetic in 45%. The leading abnormal
measure was a delayed sympathetic skin response on the foot (42% of di
abetic children) followed by a reduced amplitude of sural nerve action
potential (36%). The whole spectrum of recordings showed scattered in
volvement of nerve functions. There was no selective susceptibility of
nerve fibre types exposed to a noxious factor. Conclusion: A complex
neurophysiological assessment, including standard nerve conduction stu
dies as well as psychophysical examination and autonomic nerve functio
n tests, evaluating the function of small and large nerve fibres, is r
ecommended for evaluating the subclinical neuropathy in asymptomatic t
ype I diabetic children. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All ri
ghts reserved.