This paper reviews the logic of causal inference from epidemiological
data. I maintain that the dearest causal statements can be made when t
he philosophical causal principles of association, direction and isola
tion are upheld in epidemiological research. After reviewing the argum
ent by Holland that only experimental manipulation affords clear causa
l claims, I examine the utility of structural equation models and long
itudinal methods for making causal claims from non-experimental data.
This examination leads to the conclusion that mental health epidemiolo
gists should begin to incorporate intervention trials into the last ph
ases of their research programmes when they want to make strong causal
claims.