U. Proschel et al., COMPLICATIONS OF THE MIDDLE-EAR IN TEENAG ERS AFTER SURGICAL-TREATMENT OF CLEFT PALATES, Laryngo-, Rhino-, Otologie, 72(10), 1993, pp. 497-501
We examined two groups of teenagers who had been surgically treated as
small children for cleft palate. Most patients were between 13 and 21
years of age. One group had been looked after by the Dept. of Orthodo
ntics at the University of Erlangen-Nurnberg, the other by the Dept. o
f Orthodontics at the University of Rostock. There were differences in
sequence and time of the surgical closure between the two departments
. Additionally, 60 % of the people treated in Rostock had a velopharyn
goplastic, which was rarely the case in Erlangen. In both groups only
a few patients had been seen by an ENT-doctor regularly. Only some pat
ients had been previously treated with tubes. There was one patient in
each group with a bilateral, most likely genetically determined, sens
orineural hearing loss. In Erlangen we examined 66 teenagers (132 ears
). Six ears had been previously treated with one or more tympanoplasti
es. 10 ears needed further treatment due to a seromucotympanon, adhesi
ons, perforations of the ear drum, suspicion of cholesteatoma or insuf
ficient improvement of hearing after previous tympanoplasty. Another 1
8 ears showed signs of former inflammations. The control group in Rost
ock included 63 patients (i.e. 126 ears). 14 of the ears examined had
undergone one or more tympanoplasties previously. 13 other ears needed
further treatment for seromucotympanon, adhesions, perforations of th
e ear drum, insufficient improvement of hearing after tympanoplasty or
cholesteatoma. Residuals due to prior inflammations were found in ano
ther 26 ears. Possible reasons for the different occurrence of middle
ear problems in both groups are discussed.