D. Decker et al., EVALUATION OF THE EYTEX SYSTEM FOR USE AS A PREDICTOR OF OCULAR IRRITANCY .2. CONDITIONERS AND STYLING AIDS, Journal of toxicology. Cutaneous and ocular toxicology, 12(4), 1993, pp. 371-380
Eytex in vitro assay was used to evaluate 33 opaque and clear conditio
ners and 48 styling aids including hairsprays, mousses, styling gels,
and lotions. The assay, which operates on the principle of protein pre
cipitation, is quantitative and relatively inexpensive. Two different
protocols were used: the rapid membrane assay (RMA) protocol for the c
onditioners, mousses, styling gels, and lotions; and the upright membr
ane assay (UMA) for the hairsprays. All samples were tested in two or
more separate experiments and the scores averaged. One hundred percent
of the conditioners, 91% of the hairsprays, and 87% of the other styl
ing aids produced qualified Eytex scores. Irritation classes establish
ed previously for shampoos were used to determine correlation to Draiz
e eye irritation categories. When the Draize eye irritation class was
compared to the Eytex irritation class for a given qualified sample, t
he correlation was 1.0 for the opaque conditioners, 0.14 for the clear
conditioners, 0.87 for hairsprays, and 1.0 for the other styling aids
. This study indicates that the Eytex in vitro assay for ocular irrita
ncy can be highly predictive of Draize eye scores for opaque condition
ers and-styling aid products. Such assays could be useful as a screeni
ng tool in new product development.