The paradox of the preface and the lottery paradox are paradoxes of pr
actical certainty sharing certain features. The paradox of the lottery
argues that rational agents are at once practically certain that each
ticket in a lottery will lose but also practically certain some ticke
t will win. The paradox of the preface argues that rational agents are
at once practically certain that all facts in a written volume are tr
ue, yet are also practically certain that some fact is wrong. A differ
ence between real lotteries and prefaces is that a winning lottery tic
ket is generally an intended feature of the lottery, whereas incorrect
facts are generally unintended. Despite these similarities, Pollock g
ives a novel argument suggesting that the preface paradox warrants qua
litatively different treatment from the lottery, using as a rationale
the differences between real lotteries and prefaces. This draws a clea
r line between the work of Pollock and the work of Kyburg, both of who
m have had a prominent influence in recent thinking on nonmonotonic re
asoning in AI. This note shows there are real lotteries with the forma
l structure of the preface paradox and possibly prefaces with the form
al structure of lotteries. The surprising conclusion is that within Po
llock's framework, the treatment of any problem with a formal structur
e resembling the lottery (or the preface) depends on the process by wh
ich winning tickets (or publishing errors) are generated. The rational
es given by Pollock seem to be unrelated to the actual mechanisms impl
emented.