RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY TESTING OF THE MICHIGAN HAND OUTCOMES QUESTIONNAIRE

Citation
Kc. Chung et al., RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY TESTING OF THE MICHIGAN HAND OUTCOMES QUESTIONNAIRE, The Journal of hand surgery (St. Louis, Mo.), 23A(4), 1998, pp. 575-587
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Orthopedics,Surgery
ISSN journal
03635023
Volume
23A
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
575 - 587
Database
ISI
SICI code
0363-5023(1998)23A:4<575:RAVTOT>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
In this study, psychometric principles were used to develop an outcome s questionnaire capable of measuring health state domains important to patients with hand disorders. These domains were hypothesized to incl ude (1) overall hand function, (2) activities of daily living (ADL), ( 3) pain, (4) work performance, (5) aesthetics, and (6) patient satisfa ction with hand function. An initial pool of 100 questions was pilot-t ested for clarity in 20 patients; following factor analysis, the numbe r of questions was reduced to a 37-item Michigan Hand Outcomes Questio nnaire (MHQ). The MHQ, along with the Short Form-12, a generic health status outcomes questionnaire, was then administered to 200 consecutiv e patients at a university-based hand surgery clinic and was subjected to reliability and validity testing. The mean time required to comple te the questionnaire was 10 minutes (range, 7-20 minutes). Factor anal ysis supported the 6 hypothesized scales. Test-retest reliability usin g Spearman's correlation demonstrated substantial agreement, ranging f rom 0.81 for the aesthetics scale to 0.97 for the ADL scale. In testin g for internal consistency, Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.86 for the pain scale to 0.97 for the ADL scale (values >0.7 for Cronbach's alph a are considered a good internal consistency). Correlation between sca les gave evidence of construct validity. In comparing similar scales i n the MHQ and the Short Form-12, a moderate correlation (range, 0.54-0 .79) for the ADL, work performance, and pain scales was found. In eval uating the discriminate validity of the aesthetics scale, a significan t difference (p =.0012) was found between the aesthetics scores for pa tients with carpal tunnel syndrome and patients with rheumatoid arthri tis. The MHQ is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring hand out comes. It can be used in a clinic setting with minimal burden to patie nts. The questions in the MHQ have undergone rigorous psychometric tes ting, and the MHQ is a promising instrument for evaluation of outcomes following hand surgery. (1 Hand Surg 1998;23A:575-587. Copyright (C) 1998 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.)