A. Cequier et al., CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY VS BYPASS-SURGERY IN PROXIMAL LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY-STENOSIS, Revista espanola de cardiologia, 51, 1998, pp. 67-70
The points of view of the cardiac surgeon and the interventional cardi
ologist on their personal approach to the treatment of the significant
lesions of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery are
still a matter of controversy. Two randomized studies have compared th
e efficacy of PTCA vs CABG in the treatment of patients with isolated
proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery stenosis. Afte
r a mean follow-up of 3 years these studies concluded that the inciden
ce of events was significantly reduced in the CABG group. However, thi
s conclusion requires a cautious interpretation because of methodologi
cal limitations of these studies. On the other hand, a recent randomiz
ed study has shown a reduction in the restenosis rate when an intracor
onary stent is electively implanted after PTCA in proximal LAD stenosi
s. Similarly, surgical modifications in material and in technical aspe
cts will probably result in a reduction of the morbidity sometimes ass
ociated with surgical procedures. Presented with favourable anatomy, P
TCA with elective stent implantation may be the initial option in the
treatment of proximal LAD stenosis, especially if another revasculariz
ation procedure is contemplated in the future. However, CABG is prefer
red when the LAD lesion suggests a complicated anatomy (chronic obstru
ctions, ostial lesions or proximal bifurcations with a significant dia
gonal). Depending on the particular results for both procedures in eac
h Institution, an individual evaluation seems to be mandatory in the v
ast majority of patients.