PRIMING EFFECT AS RELATED TO DIFFICULTY IN SELECTION FOR OVERLAPPING STIMULI MANIPULATED BY THE RELATIVE LINE THICKNESS OF ATTENDED AND UNATTENDED FIGURES

Authors
Citation
H. Kobari, PRIMING EFFECT AS RELATED TO DIFFICULTY IN SELECTION FOR OVERLAPPING STIMULI MANIPULATED BY THE RELATIVE LINE THICKNESS OF ATTENDED AND UNATTENDED FIGURES, Perceptual and motor skills, 86(3), 1998, pp. 1219-1230
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Experimental
Journal title
ISSN journal
00315125
Volume
86
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Part
2
Pages
1219 - 1230
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-5125(1998)86:3<1219:PEARTD>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
The present study examined how difficulty of ignoring unattended stimu lus affected the negative priming. To establish an experimental situat ion with intentional ignoring, subjects were presented overlapping sti muli consisting of two figures of different colors and were required t o attend to one of the figures while ignoring the other. Moreover. the difficulty in selection was manipulated by their line thickness. The assumption was that the magnitude of that difficulty should increase w ith the ratio of line thickness of the unattended figure to that of th e attended one. Reaction time was measured in both ignored repetition and control conditions. In the former, both the unattended figure in t he prime and the attended one in the probe were of the same form, whil e in the latter, they were different. Priming effect was indicated by the difference between the two reaction times. Two experiments showed that the printing effect changed with the ratio of line thickness, dep icted as a V-shaped curve. The effect was facilitative at the ratio of line thickness of 1, which was inconsistent with the previous studies reporting an inhibitive effect. The following two experiments, howeve r, confirmed that the effect at the ratio of I was facilitative when t he ratio of line thickness was varied, but it was inhibitive when the ratio of line thickness was fixed within a session. The inconsistency could then be attributed to the difference in the manipulation of the ratio of line thickness.