This paper discusses the importance of lithologic discontinuities in p
edologic and geologic research, reviews the primary methods used to de
tect them, and examines some soils in northern Michigan that exhibit v
arying degrees of evidence for lithologic discontinuities. Although ma
ny different parameters have been used successfully to detect disconti
nuities in soils, those involving immobile and inert components offer
the best likelihood of success, and these data are best reported on a
clay-free basis. Parameters involving acquired (pedogenic) characteris
tics or the mobile element (plasma) of soils should be avoided. Six Ty
pic Eutroboralf pedons, formed on drumlins, were the primary focus of
this study. Obvious-to-subtle evidence exists for lithologic discontin
uities within the lower sola of these soils. Frequently, a weakly expr
essed stone line exists at or near the discontinuity. In this geologic
ally young landscape, the origin of the discontinuity is presumed to h
ave been glaciosedimentologic rather than pedologic (i.e., formed by b
ioturbation, surface creep, or eolian additions to near-surface horizo
ns). Depth functions involving clay-free particle-size data, especiall
y for coarser (coarse sand and fine gravel) fractions, were the most c
onsistent indicators of the discontinuity. Mean particle-size data and
heavy versus light minerals were also somewhat useful in discriminati
ng between the two materials. This study may be the first of its kind
to use measures of sand grain sphericity (e.g., mean feret diameter, c
ompactness, and shape factor) to identify discontinuities in soils, al
though the utility of these indices in detecting discontinuities was m
ixed. The data underscore the need for multiple lines of evidence in t
he detection of Lithologic discontinuities in soils and cautions that
they are not all geologic/sedimentologic in origin.