J. Paavonen et al., COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS OF FIRST-VOID URINE CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS SCREENING-PROGRAM, Obstetrics and gynecology, 92(2), 1998, pp. 292-298
Objective: To perform a cost-benefit analysis of a Chlamydia trachomat
is screening program based on first-void urine testing of asymptomatic
women using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. Methods: A decisi
on tree was developed. Selected variables based on assumptions were su
bjected to sensitivity analyses to make the model accurate and defensi
ble. Results: Screening for chlamydial infections using the PCR test w
as shown to be cost-effective even in low-prevalence populations. Comp
ared with a symptom-driven no-screening situation, a universal C trach
omatis screening program using the PCR test would save money, in terms
of direct cost, when the baseline prevalence of C trachomatis infecti
on exceeds 3.9%. Conclusion: Cost analyses are still rare among trials
that compare pharmacologic or procedural health care interventions. S
ocioeconomic studies linking secondary prevention of C trachomatis inf
ection and infertility and adverse pregnancy outcome are needed to con
vince public health authorities of the need for and the benefit of suc
h programs. (Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:292-8. (C) 1998 by The American Co
llege of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).