H. Porst, TRANSURETHRAL APPLICATION OF ALPROSTADIL WITH MUSE(TM) (MEDICATED URETHRAL SYSTEM FOR ERECTION) - ACTUAL OVERVIEW AND PERSONAL EXPERIENCES, Der Urologe, 37(4), 1998, pp. 410-416
An analysis of the presently available results concerning transurethra
l application of Al-prostadil with MUSE(TM) (Medicated Urethral System
for Erection) up to 1000 mu g indicates a 20-30% lower efficacy if co
mpared to 20 mu g i.c. injected Alprostadil. Whereas in prospective ho
me-treatment trials only each second MUSE(TM)-application was successf
ul in responders 87%-94% of the administrations in self-injection ther
apy resulted in successful coitus. In an own comparative trial in 73 p
ts the succes rates after MUSE(TM) up to 1000 mu g were 48% compared t
o 71% after i. c. Alprostadil. Reported side-effects of MUSE(TM) in th
e literature were: Hypotension 3-8%, syncopes 0,4%, penile/urethral pa
in 29%, urethral bleeding 5%, vaginal irritations 3%, priapisms < 0,1%
. After MUSE(TM)-applikation the average Alprostadil contents of the e
jaculate increased 40%. Whereas in prospective long-term studies of se
lf-injection therapy with Alprostadil the risk of persistent fibrotic
alterations of the penis varied between 5-7%, the risk of penile fibro
sis after MUSE(TM) can not be finally estimated. Also the potential ri
sk for urethral strictures after MUSE(TM) is presently not: foreseable
. The advantage of the technically easy use is confronted with a consi
derably lower efficacy. Therefore self-injection therapy must be furth
er on considered the ''golden standard'' in Alprostadil administration
.