GUINEA-PIG SERUM ERYTHROPOIETIN (EPO) SELECTIVELY STIMULATES GUINEA-PIG ERYTHROID PROGENITORS - HUMAN OR MOUSE ERYTHROID PROGENITORS DO NOTFORM ERYTHROID BURST-FORMING UNIT COLONIES IN RESPONSE TO GUINEA-PIG SERUM EPO
T. Stopka et al., GUINEA-PIG SERUM ERYTHROPOIETIN (EPO) SELECTIVELY STIMULATES GUINEA-PIG ERYTHROID PROGENITORS - HUMAN OR MOUSE ERYTHROID PROGENITORS DO NOTFORM ERYTHROID BURST-FORMING UNIT COLONIES IN RESPONSE TO GUINEA-PIG SERUM EPO, Experimental hematology, 26(9), 1998, pp. 910-914
Erythropoietin (EPO) is the primary regulator of mammalian erythropoie
sis, providing a proliferative and differentiative signal to the early
EPO-responsive erythroid progenitors, burst-forming unit-erythroid (B
FU-E) and colony-forming unit-erythroid, as well as to later EPO-respo
nsive Erythroid progenitors. EPO is secreted by the kidney in response
to hypoxia and anemia. There is an extensive biological crossreactivi
ty between human EPO and the EPOs of other mammals. Necas et al, have
reported that this crossreactivity may not include the guinea pig (Cav
ia porcellus). Because the specificity of the guinea pig's erythropoie
tic responses may be of biological significance, we compared guinea pi
g hypoxic serum with mouse (m) and human (h) recombinant (r) EPOs for
their ability to induce erythroid progenitor proliferation and differe
ntiation in semisolid cultures. Guinea pig bone marrow mononuclear cel
ls (BMMCs) formed BFU-E colonies in response to guinea pig hypoxic ser
um, rhEPO, or rmEPO in a dose-dependent fashion, Neither human nor mou
se BMMCs responded to guinea pig hypoxic serum; however, guinea pig hy
poxic serum exerted no inhibitory effect on human or mouse in vitro er
ythroid differentiation in the presence of rhEPO or rmEPO. The intensi
ty of the EPO band on Western blotting analysis of guinea pig hypoxic
serum was significantly greater than in nonhypoxic serum. This suggest
s that guinea pig erythropoiesis is mediated by EPO and stimulated by
hypoxia in a fashion similar to that observed in human and mouse eryth
ropoiesis. Furthermore, guinea pig EPO did not stimulate human or mous
e erythroid differentiation in vitro, whereas guinea pig erythroid pro
genitors could be stimulated by human or mouse EPO, suggesting structu
ral differences in guinea pig EPO and EPO receptor (EPOR) compared wit
h human or mouse EPO and EPOR. These differences probably evolved afte
r the guinea pig's ancestors diverged from myomorph rodents. Further c
haracterization of the guinea pig EPO and EPOR should facilitate our u
nderstanding of the interaction between EPO and EPOR.