EVALUATION OF TOTAL PURCHASING PILOTS IN ENGLAND AND SCOTLAND AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRIMARY-CARE GROUPS IN ENGLAND - PERSONAL INTERVIEWS ANDANALYSIS OF ROUTINE DATA
N. Goodwin et al., EVALUATION OF TOTAL PURCHASING PILOTS IN ENGLAND AND SCOTLAND AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRIMARY-CARE GROUPS IN ENGLAND - PERSONAL INTERVIEWS ANDANALYSIS OF ROUTINE DATA, BMJ. British medical journal, 317(7153), 1998, pp. 256-259
Objectives: To evaluate the reported achievements of the 52 first wave
total purchasing pilot schemes in 1996-7 and the factors associated w
ith these; and to 1996-7 and the factors associated with these; and to
consider die implications of these findings for the development of th
e proposed primary care groups. Design: Face to face interviews with l
ead general practitioners, project managers, and health authority repr
esentatives responsible for each pilot; and analysis of hospital episo
de statistics. Setting: England and Scotland for evaluation of pilots;
England only for consideration of implications for primary care group
s. Main outcome measures: The ability of total purchasers to achieve t
heir own objectives and their ability specifically to achieve objectiv
es in the service areas beyond fundholding included in total purchasin
g. Results: The level of achievement between pilots varied widely. Ach
ievement was more likely to be reported in primary than in secondary c
are. Reported achievements in reducing length of stay and emergency ad
missions were corroborated by analysis of hospital episode statistics.
Single practice and small multipractice pilots were more likely than
large multipractice projects to report achieving their objectives. Ach
ievements were also associated with higher direct management costs per
head and the ability to undertake independent contracting. Large mult
ipractice pilots required considerable organisational development befo
re progress could be made. Conclusion: The ability to create effective
commissioning organisations the size of the proposed primary care gro
ups should not be underestimated. To he effective commissioners, these
care groups will need to invest heavily in their organisational devel
opment and in the short term are likely to need an additional developm
ent budget rather than the reduction in spending on NHS management tha
t is planned by the government.