A recent evaluation of alternative hypotheses for the origin of the am
niotic egg, by mapping a single reproductive-mode character onto a phy
logeny of tetrapods, concluded that the alternative hypotheses were eq
ually parsimonious. However, this interpretation is dependent upon a m
istaken coding of the caecilian amphibians as showing extended embryo
retention. Although some caecilians are viviparous, phylogenetic analy
ses indicate that oviparity is ancestral for the group. With the codin
g of caecilians corrected, the most parsimonious inference is that the
ancestral amniotes did not practice extended embryo retention. A revi
ew of the available data indicates that the widespread view that a maj
ority of caecilians are viviparous is mistaken. Oviparity is the domin
ant reproductive mode in caecilians as it is in other living amphibian
s.