EVALUATION OF THE HYGIENIC PERFORMANCES OF THE PROCESSES FOR BEEF CARCASS DRESSING AT 10 PACKING PLANTS

Citation
Co. Gill et al., EVALUATION OF THE HYGIENIC PERFORMANCES OF THE PROCESSES FOR BEEF CARCASS DRESSING AT 10 PACKING PLANTS, Journal of applied microbiology, 84(6), 1998, pp. 1050-1058
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology,"Biothechnology & Applied Migrobiology
ISSN journal
13645072
Volume
84
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1050 - 1058
Database
ISI
SICI code
1364-5072(1998)84:6<1050:EOTHPO>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The hygienic performances of the carcass dressing processes at 10 beef packing plants were assessed from small sets of microbiological data. For each process, a single sample was obtained from a randomly select ed site on each of 25 randomly selected beef sides leaving the process . In addition, during a period of about a year, a further nine such se ts of samples were obtained from each of two of those processes. The a erobic bacteria, coliforms and Escherichia coli recovered from each sa mple were enumerated. For each set of 25 counts, values for the mean l og and standard deviation were calculated on the assumption that the l og values were normally distributed, and the log of the arithmetic mea n was estimated for each set from the mean log and the standard deviat ion. The processes were ranked with respect to the log mean numbers of E. coli, coliforms and total counts estimated for the products. Log m ean numbers of E. coli, coliforms and total counts ranged from about 2 to < 100 cm(-2), from about 3 to < 100 cm(-2), and from about 5 to ab out 2 cm(-2), respectively. For one of the processes, 8, 7, and 8 of t he log mean values for the replicated sets of aerobic, coliform and E. coli counts, respectively, differed by < I log unit. For the other pr ocess 5, 7, and 9 of the log mean values for the replicated sets of ae robic, coliform and E. coli counts, respectively, differed by < 1 log unit. These results indicate that the first process was generally cons istent in the contamination of carcasses with aerobes, coliforms and E . coli. The contamination of carcasses in the second process with coli forms and E. coli was also generally consistent, but contamination of those carcasses with aerobes was inconsistent. The findings suggest th at beef carcass dressing processes can be operated consistently with r espect to the bacterial contamination of carcasses, and that log mean numbers of 1 +/- 0.5 to 100 cm(-2), 1 +/- 0.5 to 100 cm(-2) and 3 +/- 0.5 cm(-2) for E. coli, coliform and total counts, respectively, may b e appropriate, commercially attainable acceptance criteria for the hyg ienic performance of beef carcass dressing processes.