To assess the efficacy of nortriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, a
s an analgesic in chronic back pain without depression, we conducted a
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial in 78 men
recruited from primary care and general orthopedic settings, who had c
hronic low back pain (pain at T-6 or below on a daily basis for 6 mont
hs or longer). Of these 57 completed the trial; of the 21 who did nor
complete, four were withdrawn because of adverse effects. The interven
tion consisted of inert placebo or nortriptyline titrated to within th
e therapeutic range for treating major depression (50-150 ng/ml). The
main outcome endpoints were pain (Descriptor Differential Scale), disa
bility (Sickness Impact Profile), health-related quality of life (Qual
ity of Well-Being Scale), mood (Beck Depression Inventory, Spielberger
State Anxiety Inventory, Hamilton Anxiety/Depression Rating Scales),
and physician rated outcome (Clinical Global Impression). Reduction in
pain intensity scores was significantly greater for participants rand
omized to nortriptyline (difference in mean change 1.68, 95% -0.001, C
I -3.36, P = 0.050), with a reduction of pain by 22% compared to 9% on
placebo. Reduction in disability marginally favored nortriptyline (P
= 0.055), but health-related quality of life, mood, and physician rati
ngs of overall outcome did not differ significantly between treatments
. Subgroup analyses of study completers supported the intent-to-treat
analysis. Also, completers with radicular pain on nortriptyline (n = 5
) had significantly (P < 0.05) better analgesia and overall outcome th
an did those on placebo (n = 6). The results suggest noradrenergic mec
hanisms are relevant to analgesia in back pain. This modest reduction
in pain intensity suggests that physicians should carefully weigh the
risks and benefits of nortriptyline in chronic back pain without depre
ssion. (C) 1998 International Association for the Study of Pain. Publi
shed by Elsevier Science B.V.