A general theory of explanation-based decision making is outlined and
the multiple roles of inference processes in the theory are indicated.
A typology of formal and informal inference forms, originally propose
d by Collins (1978a, 1978b), is introduced as an appropriate framework
to represent inferences that occur in the overarching explanation-bas
ed process. Results from the analysis of verbal reports of decision pr
ocesses are presented to demonstrate the centrality and systematic cha
racter of reasoning in a representative legal decision-making task.