STAGING LYMPHOMA WITH CT - COMPARISON OF CONTIGUOUS AND ALTERNATE 10 MM SLICE TECHNIQUES

Citation
Ks. Naik et al., STAGING LYMPHOMA WITH CT - COMPARISON OF CONTIGUOUS AND ALTERNATE 10 MM SLICE TECHNIQUES, Clinical Radiology, 53(7), 1998, pp. 523-527
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
00099260
Volume
53
Issue
7
Year of publication
1998
Pages
523 - 527
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-9260(1998)53:7<523:SLWC-C>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Purpose: To compare two computed tomography (CT) techniques, contiguou s 10 mm and alternate 10 mm slices of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, f or initial staging of lymphoma. Subjects and methods: Fifty-two consec utive patients referred at initial diagnosis for lymphoma staging by C T were examined with contiguous 10 mm slices of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. Oral contrast was administered, but no intravenous contrast. Two sets of films for each examination were printed, one with 10 mm co ntiguous slices and one with 10 mm alternate slices. The two sets of f ilms for each patient were reviewed separately in a randomized order a nd blinded fashion by two independent observers. Discrepancies mere re viewed by a third observer and subsequently resolved by consensus. Res ults: Staging assessments by both techniques were concordant in 51 of 52 cases: one patient was recorded as stage II on the alternate slice technique, but stage III with contiguous slices but this difference di d not affect management. Inter-technique agreement was very good (k = 0.97). The staging assessments showed discrepancies between the two ob servers in 12 of the 52 cases which were independent of technique (k = 0.71; good agreement). Consensus review showed them to result from di fferences in perception in seven cases and differences in interpretati on of abnormalities in five cases, Conclusion: Our findings support th e use of an alternate 10 mm slice technique in the staging of lymphoma at initial diagnosis. Observer variation was greater than the differe nce between techniques.