DO RECORDED DOSES OVERESTIMATE TRUE DOSES RECEIVED BY CHERNOBYL CLEANUP WORKERS - RESULTS OF CYTOGENETIC ANALYSES OF ESTONIAN WORKERS BY FLUORESCENCE IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION
Lg. Littlefield et al., DO RECORDED DOSES OVERESTIMATE TRUE DOSES RECEIVED BY CHERNOBYL CLEANUP WORKERS - RESULTS OF CYTOGENETIC ANALYSES OF ESTONIAN WORKERS BY FLUORESCENCE IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION, Radiation research, 150(2), 1998, pp. 237-249
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Biology Miscellaneous","Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Studies of workers who were sent to Chernobyl after the 1986 reactor a
ccident are being conducted to provide a better understanding of the e
ffects of chronic low-dose radiation exposures. A crucial component to
these investigations is an accurate assessment of the radiation doses
received during the cleanup activities. To provide information on bio
logical measurements of dose, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH
) with whole-chromosome painting probes has been applied to quantify s
table chromosome aberrations (translocations and insertions) among a d
efined cohort of 4,833 cleanup workers from Estonia. Cytogenetic analy
sis of 48-h lymphocyte cultures from 118 Estonian cleanup workers (10.
3 cGy mean recorded dose; 25 cGy maximum), 29 Estonian population cont
rols and 21 American controls was conducted by three laboratories. Mor
e than 258,000 painted metaphases were evaluated. Overall, we observed
lower translocation frequencies than has been reported in previous st
udies using FISH among Chernobyl cleanup workers. In our data, a clear
association with increased levels of translocations was seen with inc
reasing age at blood drawing. There was no correlation, however, betwe
en aberration frequency and recorded measurements of physical dose or
any category of potential high-dose and high-dose-rate exposure such a
s being sent to Chernobyl in 1986, working on the roof near the damage
d nuclear reactor, working in special zones or having multiple tours.
In fact, the translocation frequency was lower among the exposed worke
rs than the controls, though not significantly so. To estimate the lev
el of effect that would have been expected in a population of men havi
ng an average dose of similar to 10 cGy, blood from six donors was exp
osed to low-LET radiation, and more than 32,000 metaphases were scored
to estimate dose-response coefficients for radiation-induced transloc
ations in chromosome pairs 1, 2 and 4. Based on these results, we esti
mate that had this group of 118 men received an average whole-body dos
e of 10-11 cGy, as chronic or acute exposures, an increase in the mean
frequency of chromosome translocations of more than 40-65% would have
been observed in their lymphocytes compared to findings in nonirradia
ted controls. In spite of evaluating more than a quarter of a million
metaphases, we were unable to detect any increase in the mean, median
or range in chromosome aberrations in lymphocyte cultures from a group
of Estonian men who took part in the cleanup of the Chernobyl nuclear
power site and those who did not. We conclude that it is likely that
recorded doses for these cleanup workers overestimate their average bo
ne marrow doses, perhaps substantially. These results are consistent w
ith several negative studies of cancer incidence in Chernobyl cleanup
workers and, if borne out, suggest that future studies may not be suff
iciently powerful to detect increases in leukemia or cancer, much less
distinguish differences between the effects of chronic compared to br
ief radiation exposures. (C) 1998 by Radiation Research Society.