Dl. Miller et al., EFFECT OF FAT-FREE POTATO-CHIPS WITH AND WITHOUT NUTRITION LABELS ON FAT AND ENERGY INTAKES, The American journal of clinical nutrition, 68(2), 1998, pp. 282-290
This study investigated the effect on fat and energy intakes of fat-fr
ee potato chips made with olestra compared with regular potato chips.
Ninety-five participants (unrestrained and restrained males and female
s) were tested in 2 conditions. In the information condition, particip
ants were given nutrition information about the chips and were aware t
hat the chips differed in fat and energy contents. In the no-informati
on condition, participants were not aware of the differences. In both
conditions, participants ate either regular or fat-free potato chips a
d libitum for an afternoon snack in a crossover design in two 10-d per
iods. To assess 24-h intake, participants completed food diaries twice
in each 10-d period. The results showed that all groups significantIy
reduced their fat and energy intakes in the snack when eating the fat
-free chips compared with the regular chips (P < 0.0001), Also. potato
chip intake did not differ across time for either type of chip. Over
24 h all participants had lower fat intakes (P < 0.05) when eating the
fat-free potato chips compared with the regular chips, but 24-h energ
y intake was not significantly different between groups. When informat
ion was provided, restrained participants ate more of the fat-free chi
ps than the regular chips; however tills increase did not negate the r
eductions in fat and energy associated with rating the fat-free chips.
This study showed that substituting fat-free (olestra-containing) pot
ato chips for regular-fat chips can help reduce fat and energy intakes
in short-term (within meal) situations and reduce fat intake over 24
h.