J. Ho et Am. Winer, EFFECTS OF FUEL TYPE, DRIVING CYCLE, AND EMISSION STATUS ON IN-USE VEHICLE EXHAUST REACTIVITY, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 48(7), 1998, pp. 592-603
The introduction of reformulated gasolines significantly reduced exhau
st hydrocarbon (HC) mass emissions, but few data are available concern
ing how these new fuels affect exhaust reactivity. Similarly, while it
is well established that high-emitting vehicles contribute a signific
ant portion of total mobile source HC mass emissions, it is also impor
tant to evaluate the exhaust reactivity from these vehicles. The objec
tive of this study was to evaluate the relative influence on in-use ve
hicle exhaust reactivity of three critical factors: fuel, driving cycl
e, and vehicle emission status. Nineteen in-use vehicles were tested w
ith seven randomly assigned fuel types and two driving cycles: the Fed
eral Test Procedure (FTP) and the Unified Cycle (UC). Total exhaust re
activity was not statistically different between the FTP and UC cycles
but was significantly affected by fuel type. On average, the exhaust
reactivity for California Phase 2 fuel was the lowest (16 % below the
highest fuel type) among the seven fuels tested for cold start emissio
ns. The average exhaust reactivity for high-emitting vehicles was sign
ificantly higher for hot stabilized (11%) and hot start (15%) emission
s than for low-emitting vehicles. The exhaust reactivities for the FTP
and UC cycles for light-end HCs and carbonyls were significantly diff
erent for the hot stabilized mode. There was a significant fuel effect
on the mean specific reactivity (SR) for the mid-range HCs, but not f
or light-end HCs or carbonyls, while vehicle emission status affected
the mean SR for all three HC compound classes.