STRATEGIES FOR ANALYZING NERVE-CONDUCTION DATA - SUPERIORITY OF A SUMMARY INDEX OVER SINGLE TESTS

Citation
Lr. Robinson et al., STRATEGIES FOR ANALYZING NERVE-CONDUCTION DATA - SUPERIORITY OF A SUMMARY INDEX OVER SINGLE TESTS, Muscle & nerve, 21(9), 1998, pp. 1166-1171
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
0148639X
Volume
21
Issue
9
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1166 - 1171
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-639X(1998)21:9<1166:SFAND->2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
We compared three strategies for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: us ing a single test; requiring one, two, or th ree of three tests to be abnormal; or utilizing a single summary variable incorporating data fr om three tests. Sixty-five hands of subjects without clinical carpal t unnel syndrome (CTS) were compared with 66 hands with clinical CTS. Th ree latency differences were measured: median-ulnar (8 cm) midpalmar o rthodromic (palmdiff); median-ulnar ring finger (14 cm) antidromic (ri ngdiff); and median-radial thumb (10 cm) antidromic (thumbdiff). The c ombined sensory index (CSI) was the sum of these three differences. Se nsitivity for the tests was palmdiff 69.7%, ringdiff 74.2%, thumbdiff 75.8%, and CSI 83.1%. Specificity was 95.4-96.9%. Requiring one, two, or three of three tests to be abnormal yielded sensitivities of 84.8%, 74.2%, or 56.1%, respectively, but specificities of 92.3%, 98.5%, and 100%, respectively. We conclude that a combined index improves diagno stic classification over use of single test results. (C) 1998 John Wil ey & Sons, Inc.