O. Traore et al., REVERSE-TRANSCRIPTASE PCR DETECTION OF ASTROVIRUS, HEPATITIS-A VIRUS,AND POLIOVIRUS IN EXPERIMENTALLY CONTAMINATED MUSSELS - COMPARISON OFSEVERAL EXTRACTION AND CONCENTRATION METHODS, Applied and environmental microbiology, 64(8), 1998, pp. 3118-3122
Four methods of extraction and three methods of concentration of three
enteric viruses from mussels were comparatively evaluated by reverse
transcriptase PCR (PZT-PCR). Shellfish were experimentally contaminate
d by immersion in seawater seeded with astrovirus, hepatitis A virus,
or poliovirus. Sixty-gram samples of mussel tissues mere processed by
using berate buffer, glycine solution, saline beef, and saline beef-Fr
eon extraction methods, The viruses were concentrated by precipitation
with polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG 6000) or PEG 8000 or by organic fl
occulation, RT-PCR was performed with RNA extracts from crude shellfis
h extracts and concentrates with and without Sephadex LH20 filtration.
The glycine solution and berate buffer extraction methods resulted in
significantly more RT-PCR-positive samples than the saline beef extra
ction method. We assessed the efficiency of 20 combinations of extract
ion and concentration methods. The berate buffer-organic flocculation,
berate buffer-PEG 6000, and glycine solution-PEG 6000 combinations ga
ve RT-PCR-positive results for all 27 samples analyzed for the three v
iruses. Detoxification of the samples by Sephadex LH20 filtration sign
ificantly decreased the efficiency of RT-PCR virus detection.