G. Bush et al., THE COUNTING STROOP - AN INTERFERENCE TASK SPECIALIZED FOR FUNCTIONALNEUROIMAGING - VALIDATION-STUDY WITH FUNCTIONAL MRI, Human brain mapping, 6(4), 1998, pp. 270-282
Citations number
91
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
The anterior cingulate cortex has been activated by color Stroop tasks
, supporting the hypothesis that it is recruited to mediate response s
election or allocate attentional resources when confronted with compet
ing information-processing streams. The current study used the newly d
eveloped ''Counting Stroop'' to identify the mediating neural substrat
e of cognitive interference. The Counting Stroop, a Stroop variant all
owing on-line response time measurements while obviating speech, was c
reated because speaking produces head movements that can exceed those
tolerated by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), preventing
the collection of vital performance data. During this task, subjects r
eport by button-press the number of words (1-4) on the screen, regardl
ess of word meaning. Interference trials contain number words that are
incongruent with the correct response (e.g., ''two'' written three ti
mes), while neutral trials contain single semantic category common ani
mals (e.g., ''bird''). Nine normal right-handed adult volunteers under
went fMRI while performing the Counting Stroop. Group fMRI data reveal
ed significant (P less than or equal to 10(-4)) activity in the cognit
ive division of anterior cingulate cortex when contrasting the interfe
rence vs. neutral conditions. On-line performance data showed 1) longe
r reaction times for interference blocks than for neutral ones, and 2)
decreasing reaction times with practice during interference trials (d
iminished interference effects), indicating that learning occurred. Th
e performance data proved to be a useful guide in analyzing the image
data. The relative difference in anterior cingulate activity between t
he interference and neutral conditions decreased as subjects learned t
he task. These findings have ramifications for attentional, cognitive
interference, learning, and motor control mechanism theories. Hum. Bra
in Mapping 6:270-282, 1998. a 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.