Currency risk is low in the long term, as exchange rates tend to rever
t to fundamentals over the very long run, but the contribution of curr
encies to the longterm performance of a global portfolio never gets to
be nil. Currency risk premiums exist in the long run and are consiste
nt with world market equilibrium and finance theory. The author argues
that if the plan sponsor sets a benchmark for a very long-term horizo
n (say, fifty years), it should probably be unhedged as currency retur
ns provide only a small, positive or negative, contribution to total r
eturn, while systematic currency hedging is a cumbersome process. If t
he plan sponsor has in mind a shorter strategic horizon (say, five yea
rs), the ideal currency allocation in the strategic benchmark is, and
will remain, a question open to debate. Applying some universal hedgin
g rule is questionable in the presence of the complex,correlation stru
cture of stock prices, interest rates, and exchange rates. Finally, th
e author explains that if the plan sponsor believes in active manageme
nt, currencies should be an integral part of the tactical asset alloca
tion and security valuation process.