COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES OF INTERDENTAL ORAL HYGIENE - INTERDENTAL BRUSHES VERSUS DENTAL-FLOSS

Citation
V. Christou et al., COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES OF INTERDENTAL ORAL HYGIENE - INTERDENTAL BRUSHES VERSUS DENTAL-FLOSS, Journal of periodontology, 69(7), 1998, pp. 759-764
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
ISSN journal
00223492
Volume
69
Issue
7
Year of publication
1998
Pages
759 - 764
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3492(1998)69:7<759:CODAOI>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to compare in untreated patients suffering from moderate to severe periodontitis the efficacy of dental floss (DF) and interdental brushes (IDB) in the reduction of plaque, gingival inflammation, and probing depth in a 6-week period prior to s ubgingival debridement. Twenty-six patients (12 female, 14 male; mean age 37.4 years; range 27 to 72 years) were instructed to use DF for on e side of the dentition and IDB for the other side as an adjunct to th e daily toothbrushing for 6 weeks. Oral hygiene instructions for tooth brushing and the use of the two devices were given at baseline and at week 3. Measurements were carried out at baseline and at 6 weeks inclu ding plaque scores, probing depth, and 2 bleeding scores (periodontal pocket bleeding index and angulated bleeding index). With the IDB, the approximal plaque score at baseline of 3.09 reduced to 2.15 at 6 week s and with DF, from 3.10 to 2.47, respectively. IDB proved to remove s ignificantly more plaque than DF. Baseline probing depth of 5.84 mm fo r IDB sites and 5.59 mm for DF sites was reduced to 5.01 mm at 6 weeks for both regimens. Analysis showed that the use of IDB resulted in a greater pocket reduction. Both bleeding indices were slightly reduced with IDB and DF, but no differences between devices were found. In rel ation to patient acceptance, more problems were observed with DF, and IDB were felt to be more efficacious. In conclusion, the results of th e present study indicate that in combination with a manual toothbrush, the use of interdental brushes is more effective in removal of plaque and results in a larger reduction of probing depth than the use of de ntal floss. Although the differences were small, they indicate, in com bination with patient preferences, that interdental brushes are to be considered preferable to floss for interdental plaque removal in patie nts suffering from moderate to severe periodontitis.